Finally the UK Q1 2011 figures are out.
The private sector is still saving 7% of GDP overall, and the improvement in government funds is entirely down to an improved balance of trade - an increase in exports by the look of it.
Household saving overall remains weak at 0.7% of GDP. And those private non-financials continue to hoard money as they have been doing since 2002.
Source: Office of National Statistics, tables RPZD, RPYN, RQAW, RPZT, RQCH, DJDS (Seasonally adjusted Net Lending/Borrowing per sector plus residual error) and YBHA (Gross domestic product at market prices, seasonally adjusted)
Wednesday, 29 June 2011
Saturday, 25 June 2011
Stagflation in the 1970s: A Post Keynesian Analysis
An excellent analysis (with references!) of the 1970s Stagflation episode by the indefatigable Lord Keynes
Read and enjoy.
Read and enjoy.
Thursday, 9 June 2011
The world's most simple national debt and deficit explanation
This video demonstrates the Paradox of Productivity very nicely.
The soundtrack is a bit stilted, but stick with it. It's good stuff.
The soundtrack is a bit stilted, but stick with it. It's good stuff.
Labels:
debt crisis,
deficit,
economics,
explanation,
mmt
Thursday, 2 June 2011
The confidence fairy - missing in action?
Interesting post by Nick Rowe on the latest data from the survey of consumers that shows a key assumption in many models may not be applicable at the moment (if at all).
and the data doesn't look good.
And it appears that this assumption is key to making the 'new Keynesian' multipliers much less than the 'Old Keynesian multipliers'. And those lower multipliers are one of the arguments against government action (whether cutting taxes or spending).
This period of economic activity is like a pinch point in biological evolution. The data coming out of it should be killing off economic models that are simply non-predictive, or at the very least causing them to adapt rapidly. I can't say I'm seeing a lot of that at present.
Now, why should people, rationally, expect their income to revert to trend? What's the fundamental re-equilibrating force that ends recessions in a New Keynesian model? The short answer is that there isn't one. Mathematicians will recognise that my solution 3 is just one of many possible solutions. Y(t) = A - BM(t), where A is any positive or negative number, also works. We just assume that people trust the central bank will do whatever it takes to bring income back to trend eventually, and work backwards from there. We assume there's a confidence fairy, in other words.
and the data doesn't look good.
And now we have empirical evidence that the New Keynesian confidence fairy isn't working.
And it appears that this assumption is key to making the 'new Keynesian' multipliers much less than the 'Old Keynesian multipliers'. And those lower multipliers are one of the arguments against government action (whether cutting taxes or spending).
This period of economic activity is like a pinch point in biological evolution. The data coming out of it should be killing off economic models that are simply non-predictive, or at the very least causing them to adapt rapidly. I can't say I'm seeing a lot of that at present.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
