Some of the quotes from the accounts are too good to be left hidden away in a PDF.
Paragraph 2.2 (pp7) sets the scene:
This is corroborated by the auditor in paragraph 7.16 (pp50)HM Treasury identifies the entities to be included in WGA in accordance with the legislation thatrequired WGA to be prepared1. It is required to include entities that “exercise functions of a publicnature” or that are “substantially funded from public money”. The Treasury’s decisions are consistentwith the classification of entities to the public sector by the ONS. This is because the ONS takes accountof these factors when making their classification decision as well as the degree of control thatgovernment has over each entity.
Therefore, unsurprisingly, the accounts include the central bank (para 7.75 pp76)To be included in the WGA, a body must do the work of the UK government, be accountable to, or be otherwisecontrolled by government.
The bilateral relationship between HM Treasury and the Bank of England is similarly explained clearly. Para 3.80 (pp28) shows that the indemnities between them are irrelevant at the consolidated level.the Treasury has taken steps to make the WGA more transparent and complete. The 2010-11 WGA: … consolidated the financial activities of additional bodies, such as the Bank of England
A number of guarantees and indemnities exist between HM Treasury and the Bank of England. These are not disclosed in Whole of Government Accounts, as both bodies are included in the consolidated financial statements.The same point is made in Para 3.85 (pp 29)
MMT says that QE is an asset swap and effectively eliminates any Gilts purchased. The accounts agree in para 7.50 (pp 62)Arrangements between bodies within the WGA boundary, such as guarantees and indemnities between HM Treasury and the Bank of England, are not included, as they eliminate on consolidation in these accounts.
Para 7.54 (pp65) expands on this and delivers the killer conclusion:As at 31 March 2011, there were some £1,059 billion of gilts outstanding but the WGA shows asmaller figure of £746 billion (Figure 10). The WGA is not intended to include as liabilities gilts held asassets by entities in the WGA, such as the Bank of England Asset Purchase Facility Fund as part ofQuantitative Easing (paragraphs 7.53 to 7.54).
In addition the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (pp94) contains the term "Financed by Taxpayers' Equity". Which is exactly correct. The net savings of the non-government sector is indeed Taxpayers' Equity.Consolidating Quantitative Easing does not significantly reduce the overall liabilities of governmentbut it does reduce the number reported as government borrowing. Once intra-government transactionsare eliminated, the scheme represents an exchange of gilts (liabilities of the National Loans Fund) forcentral bank reserves (liabilities of the Bank of England).
When you apply the International Financial Reporting Standards to a set of government accounts, the MMT viewpoint arises quite naturally from the numbers.